The Silent Tax on African Fashion MSMEs

FEATURED BLOG


The Silent Tax on African Fashion MSMEs


Jan 2026

 

Across Africa, fashion and design entrepreneurs are repeatedly told that scale lies beyond their borders. Regional markets are viewed as the natural next step: sell to the next country, tap into AfCFTA, grow volumes, and build brands. On paper, the opportunity appears to be real. In practice, cross-border trade functions less like a pathway to growth and more like a silent tax - one that disproportionately penalises small fashion and design-led MSMEs.

This tax is structural, not transactional. It’s embedded in how trade actually functions: slow and unpredictable logistics, high operational costs, fragmented digital and financial infrastructure, and piecemeal regulatory alignment. These frictions show up as eroded margins, foregone orders, and small creative businesses choosing not to scale at all.

When Delays Become Commercial Risk

Fashion is a time-sensitive business by design. Small production runs and seasonal demand leave little room for unpredictability. In this context, customs clearance times are not an abstract efficiency metric, they directly affect revenue. Even with AfCFTA’s trade facilitation ambitions, import dwell times on the continent average more than 8 days, far above norms in advanced economies where clearance is measured in hours or a day at most.

Across African markets, the median stands at seven days and the average at nearly nine, with only about one in five countries (including Botswana, Cabo Verde, Burkina Faso, Morocco, and Tunisia) clearing goods in under five days. By contrast, nearly one in four countries exceeds ten days, pushing shipments into high-risk territory for time-bound goods like fashion. This includes extreme outliers such as Mozambique (39 days), Mauritania (26 days), Burundi (21 days), Madagascar (20 days), and Côte d’Ivoire (18 days). Even relatively stronger performers reflect this friction: Kenya ranges from three to ten days, Rwanda averages seven, while Nigeria and Ghana sit at around nine and eight days, respectively.

These delays act as a commercial risk baked into the delivery schedule. The unpredictability -  clearance times that can vary from a couple of days to several weeks -  forces small business owners to build unrealistically large buffers, tie up working capital unnecessarily, or simply decline regional orders. This is a behavioural tax: you trade less, not because demand is absent, but because risk is priced into every shipment.

Notably, AfCFTA’s trade facilitation measures and digital customs innovations are beginning to move the needle in pilot corridors - reducing processing times significantly in cases where digital pre-clearance systems have been trialled. But these remain pilots, unevenly rolled out and far from continent-wide coverage. 

Digital Trade Meets the Reality of Connectivity Costs

As physical trade becomes more complex, fashion MSMEs are increasingly expected to rely on digital channels such as online marketing and e-commerce platforms. But digital participation itself comes at a cost, especially when it comes to internet pricing.

Nigeria and Ghana, for instance, have relatively affordable data prices at around $0.39 - $0.40 per GB, while Kenya and Rwanda sit slightly higher at $0.55 - $0.59 per GB. Senegal’s costs rise further, at approximately $1.63 per GB, and South Africa’s closer to $1.81 per GB. These figures may appear modest in isolation, but for small businesses operating on tight margins, they shape how often and how effectively digital tools are used.

Digital trade, in this environment, does not automatically reduce friction. Instead, it shifts part of the burden onto MSMEs, who must self-finance the infrastructure needed to participate.

Payments: The Point Where Friction Turns Into Risk

If delays raise costs and connectivity limits reach, payment systems determine whether cross-border trade is financially survivable. Across Africa, payment infrastructure largely exists. Roughly seven in ten countries participate in some form of instant or near-instant payment system, including Nigeria’s NIBSS Instant Payments, Ghana’s GhIPSS, Kenya’s PesaLink and mobile money platforms, and Rwanda’s eKash. On paper, this signals meaningful progress.

In practice, these systems remain regionally siloed and weakly interoperable. While domestic payments are often instant, cross-border transactions frequently fall back on slower, costlier channels or partial pilot systems. Pan-African initiatives such as PAPSS are present, but coverage and commercial usability remain uneven. For fashion MSMEs, availability does not translate into reliability.

This distinction is critical. A delayed cross-border payment is not an accounting inconvenience; it disrupts cash flow at the exact point where small firms are most exposed. Late payments can halt production, delay wages, or prevent the purchase of raw materials for the next order. Large firms manage this risk through credit lines, but small creative businesses cannot.

As a result, fragmented systems do not stop trade outright, but they force MSMEs to absorb volatility they are ill-equipped to manage - reinforcing the perception that cross-border trade is risky rather than scalable.

Beyond Tariffs: The Real Barriers to MSME Integration

There’s a persistent narrative,  anchored in AfCFTA’s promise, that reducing tariffs will unleash MSME exports. But fashion MSMEs are seldom stopped by tariffs in the first place; many already operate in duty-free corridors because the products they trade are often below tariff thresholds or already liberalised. What they face instead are procedural and non-tariff frictions.

Trade facilitation frameworks under AfCFTA (including customs integration, digital trade platforms, and non-tariff barrier reporting tools) are a start. Yet persistent fragmentation in rulebooks, compliance requirements, and documentation standards means that businesses must still “relearn” the rules at every border. This raises not only cost but cognitive load — an invisible barrier that disproportionately affects smaller firms with limited administrative capacity.

African fashion MSMEs are not blocked by a lack of demand. They are constrained by how regional trade actually functions.. Until trade systems reward reliability rather than scale, cross-border trade will not drive MSME growth. It will continue to select against it.

 
Previous
Previous

Refugee Economies as Agricultural Growth Nodes

Next
Next

PAFTRAC Africa CEO Trade Survey Report 2025